WHY TREAT WITH REBLOZYL:
PRIMARY ENDPOINT AND EPO ≤200 U/L RESULTS
REBLOZYL can replace epoetin alfa in first-line LR-MDS, including in patients with EPO ≤200 U/L1
The head-to-head COMMANDS trial measured the percentage of patients who achieved BOTH a 1.5 g/dL Hgb increase AND ≥12 weeks of transfusion independence2*†
REBLOZYL was studied head-to-head against EA in adult patients with anemia due to LR-MDS who were ESA-naive and required transfusions. Primary endpoint: 58.5% of patients taking REBLOZYL achieved the primary composite endpoint of ≥12 week red blood cell TI and Hgb increase ≥1.5 g/dL (n=86/147; 95% CI: 50.1, 66.6) vs 31.2% of patients taking EA (n=48/154; 95% Cl: 24.0, 39.1).2
PREPLANNED EPO ≤200 U/L SUBGROUP ANALYSIS (DURING WKS 1-24)1
Historically, low serum EPO was a predictor of ESA response3
Now we can see, patients with low serum
EPO are appropriate for REBLOZYL1
*For any consecutive 12-week period during Weeks 1-24.2
†Defined as the absence of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 12-week period.2
Preplanned EPO >200 to <500 U/L subgroup analysis (during wks 1-24)1:
37.8% of REBLOZYL patients (n=14/37) vs 10.8% of epoetin alfa patients (n=4/37) achieved the primary endpoint.
Analysis limitations of response rates by baseline sEPO4:
These preplanned subgroup analyses should not be interpreted to determine treatment differences between arms in these subgroups due to limited sample size, lack of statistical hypothesis testing, and increased probability of a false-positive finding.
Subgroup analyses were performed for the primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints. Formal hypothesis testing was not performed in the subgroup analysis.
PRIMARY COMPOSITE ENDPOINT: INTENT TO TREAT INTERIM ANALYSIS (DURING WKS 1-24)2‡
‡Common rate difference (95% CI): 26.6 (15.8, 37.4) P<0.0001.2
Other key secondary endpoints2:
- HI-E per IWG ≥8 wks (Wks 1-24): REBLOZYL 74.1% (n=109/147), EA 51.3% (n=79/154)
- RBC-TI for 24 wks (Wks 1-24): REBLOZYL 47.6% (n=70/147), EA 29.2% (n=45/154)
- RBC-TI for ≥12 wks (Wks 1-24): REBLOZYL 66.7% (n=98/147), EA 46.1% (n=71/154)
CI=confidence interval; EA=epoetin alfa; EPO=erythropoietin; ESA=erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; Hgb=hemoglobin; HI-E=hematologic improvement-erythroid; IWG=International Working Group; LR-MDS=lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes; Q3W=once every 3 weeks; RBC=red blood cell; RBC-TI=red blood cell transfusion independence; sEPO=serum erythropoietin; TI=transfusion independence.


See the safety data for REBLOZYL
References: 1. Della Porta MG, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, et al. Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11(9)(suppl):e646-e658. doi:10.1016/52352-3026(24)00203-5 2. REBLOZYL [US Prescribing Information]. Summit. NJ: Celgene Corporation; 2026. 3. Park S, Grabar 5, Kelaidi C, et al. Predictive factors of response and survival in myelodysplastic syndrome treated with erythropoietin and G-CSF: the GFM experience. Blood. 2008;111(2):574-582. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096370 4. Data on file. BMS-REF-ACE-536-0009. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: 2023.